From: gh.robin <gh....@la...> - 2007-06-30 15:07:37
|
On Sat 30 June 2007 10:11, Detlef Faber wrote: > Hello Gerard, > > very nice Aircraft indeed > > > > > > Woohooo, did anyone try putting this baby into a low-speed stall ? > > > > > Make sure to gain enough altitude before ! > > > > > > > > yes it is given to stall at 91 kt, the model with that "crude" FDM > > > > [...] > > > > > > surprised how this beast behaves at stall and how difficult stall > > > recovery might become .... It would be nice to know if this is > > > actually similar to the 'real' one, > > > > > > Martin. > > > > Diff icult to answer, just this, which has been written : > > > > =3D>About the only significant short coming of the Lightning was > > spin/.stall recovery, which could be a bear, especially at low altitude. > > That's is why this film cautions strongly against entering a spin below > > 10,000'<=3D > > the manual states: > > As stalling speed is approached, the center section stalls first with > noticeable shaking of the airplane, however, the ailerons remain > effective. > > In either "power-on" or "power-off" stalls with flaps and landing gear > up, the airplane "mushes" straight forward in a well-controlled stall. > With flaps and landing gear down, there appears to be a slight tendency > for one wing to drop. There is, however, no tendency to spin. Under > these conditions, the nose drops slightly and, as the speed increases, > the wing will come up. > > SPINS. > Deliberate spinning is prohibited because the spin tends to flatten out > after two or three turns. When this occurs, the control column is forced > back and engine power must be used to help get the control column > forward. Before flattening out, normal recovery may be made without > power. Recovery is made' by applying full opposite rudder and easing the > control column forward. > > If you don't already have it, I will send it to you. > > Greetings > > Detlef Detlef, Many thanks, and again, i hope you did not loose to much time, you started = to=20 work on your model. On my side as i said before, that model was ready some years ago (i just=20 included some instruments taken from others recent existing aircraft, these= s=20 instrument must be improved) My target was to make a variant, in order to answer an old wish =3D>to mak= e the=20 St Exupery Aircraft which was the last he had flown, he never came back fro= m=20 mission: here a link http://www.flyandrive.com/cadresaintex02.htm =20 and that other link (sorry in French only)=20 http://aeroclubstdizier.free.fr/historique_st_ex.htm today we know i was shot over Marseille. here the link http://www.aero-relic.org/English/F-5B_42-68223_St_Exupery/e-00-stexuperyf5= b.htm I will make that P38 "F-5B" variant (with a pilot who could look like St E= X=20 face :) ) I mainly work with the documents, that i have are from paper ( old history= =20 books aircraft, and specialized magazines, more than 50 years=20 collection :) ). I could read that P38 was very difficult to fly, and the victories, when =20 fighting ,where due to the main quality high climb speed and altitude=20 capability. The low speed manoeuvrability being very difficult. With Flightgear we can enjoy to gather the history acknowledge and these= =20 specific aircrafts which where involved in the History. It would nice to read your manual, so i could learn more on that "wild=20 beast" . On a private mail i will send you my private address mail. Cheers > -- =20 G=E9rard |