From: Arnt K. <ar...@c2...> - 2006-07-07 21:07:44
|
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:02:36 +0200, Mathias wrote in message <200...@gm...>: > On Friday 07 July 2006 12:36, Erik Hofman wrote: > > Mathias Frch wrote: > > > BTW: is sombody out there maintaining the SP_FDM? ..I can do these, _after_ AirVenture, is 2 weeks from now. > > I'm not sure about the ADA FDM but I would not want to see the ACMS > > FDM yanked since it has been (and can be) used to playback the > > information stored on the Flight Data Recorder (black box). ..you Erik maintain the ACMS fdm? > Not completely yanked, just get rid of those various ifdefs that > enable special features in the HUD or instrumentation only for > SP_FDM. > > I think those features n the HUD shoulod be available for every FDM. > The input values sould have an arbitrary property as input. > > The question for a maintainer is because of some coorination that > might be required if that is changed. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. |