|
From: Durk T. <d.t...@xs...> - 2006-05-26 16:56:54
|
Curtis L. Olson wrote: > Martin Spott wrote: >> The triangles don't have to be changed at all because in our Scenery >> the tidal area is part of the ocean. The idea was about changing >> nothing but the colour, >> > > Ok, so you are only talking about areas that are marked explicitly as > tidal areas in our land use/land cover data base, and then they would > be either at full tide or no tide ... that's probably simpler to manage. > > Curt. > I like the idea. Having some real-life experience flying over the "wadden" area that Martin (Doege) referred to, I can tell that the low tide areas can be very scenic. A change in texture would indeed suffice, because the elevation differences are almost negligable. Cheers, Durk |