|
From: Steve H. <st...@ca...> - 2006-05-26 12:55:27
|
Martin Doege wrote: > Of course the tide calculations would not be required to be extremely=20 > accurate =E0 la xtide -- the hour angle of the Moon would probably be=20 > quite sufficient as a broad indication of tide. > It would have to be slightly more than just that. At the very least,=20 you'd need a delay-factor for the local hour-angle of the moon. Also an=20 amplitude-factor. Even then, you'd sometimes get the tide happening about an hour=20 displaced from reality due to the loss of the solar tide. If you added a=20 simple solar tide (i.e a delay factor for the local solar hour-angle and=20 a solar-tide amplitude-factor) then you'd probably be getting a pretty=20 good rough approximation for a given area. Good enough for a flight-sim,=20 certainly. It would also better model those areas of the world where the solar tide=20 dominates and there's only one significant tide per day. Steve |