From: James T. <zak...@ma...> - 2006-04-18 12:54:44
|
On 18 Apr 2006, at 11:53, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > Umm, no. The "end part"?! This should be OK then. But it gets more and > more fragile because of such manually resolved dependencies. Agreed - hence this discussion. Otherwise we'll end up with postpostpostinit(), or as I like to call it, 'run level 4' :) H&H James |