From: Curtis L. O. <cur...@fl...> - 2006-03-16 16:48:12
|
Thomas Förster wrote: >Am Freitag 10 März 2006 16:12 schrieb Vassilii Khachaturov: > > >>There is also an existing bug tracker over at >>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=583&atid=100583 >>which has been there for several years already; >>at one point when I looked for a place to write down >>the bugs that bother me but which I am not planning to >>work on in the nearest future, I began putting them >>into it. Also, I went over whatever older bugs that were >>there which I could re-test and removed whatever was >>obsolete, as well as annotated whatever was still pertinent >>in this way or that. I was hoping that maybe other >>folks will join me using the same bug database, >>but noone seemed to need it, except for me. >> >> > >Oh, I didn't even know that it existed in the first place. So setting the >tracker up was definitely not meant as a replacement. I'm happy with either >solution, be it using the SF tracker, switching mine off or the other way >'round... > >But we should decide before things start splitting. And at least announce it >prominently for users. > > Let me know which one you want to use (factoring longevity, support, features, etc.) Curt. -- Curtis Olson http://www.flightgear.org/~curt HumanFIRST Program http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/ FlightGear Project http://www.flightgear.org Unique text: 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d |