|
From: Melchior F. <mf...@ao...> - 2006-02-21 14:33:13
|
* Erik Hofman -- Tuesday 21 February 2006 13:20: > I have finally made the decision not to commit any patches from others > anymore. I think I've done my time over the last few years but this > accident this morning alone has cost me more than half a day. Sorry to hear that. I'm aware that you had to carry the main load of committing patch contributions. On the other hand, I do now feel the need to defend myself, because it may appear as if it was my fault. It was not. 1. I didn't want to make this FSF address patch at all, but was encouraged. (When I explained why I wouldn't do it, I only got a "Bah.", as in: "weak excuse!". So I made and submitted it anyway.) 2. The patch was well tested & against a clean SG/CVS/HEAD. It is correct as you can see here in the originally submitted file: http://members.aon.at/mfranz/simgear.diff.gz [7.8 kB] I tried it again right now and it applied cleanly *and* correctly, as did reverting it. ($ zcat simgear.diff.gz|patch -R -p0) 3. I don't see how reverting two patches takes more than a half day. Actually, I'd be surprised if it took more than half an hour. I'd give it no more than 10 minutes. Unless, of course, cvs or patch has a bug that doesn't allow it. I can't, however, imagine that Erik made a mistake. It looks very much like a "cvs" or "patch" bug. Nothing in the patch justifies the outcome. Not even if it had been applied wrongly (which it hardly was -- Erik isn't a cvs beginner). m. |