Re: [Flightgear-devel] Nasal/IRIX bug, fixed.

[Mathias <Mat...@gm...>]

Hi,

On Tuesday 03 January 2006 18:17, Erik Hofman wrote:
> Aha, that might well be the problem then.
> It would be a good idea to solve this for all platforms (even untested
> ones) then.
Your proposed fix to use a function instead of a macro seems to fix that.
The evaluation order is forced to one of those possibilities by the fact th=
at=20
the arguments need to be evaluated before the function body is entered.
And if it works then, it is probably the desired order :)

   Greetings

          Mathias

=2D-=20
Mathias Fr=F6hlich, email: Mat...@gm...