|
From: Cameron M. <li...@to...> - 2001-09-06 20:20:20
|
* Der...@Un... [2001.09.06 14:11]: > "John Wojnaroski" <ca...@mm...> writes: > > > Alex writes: > > > > > Have you checked whether the OS is actually doing the broadcasts > > > using > another program to send and receive the packets ? I've > > > had some Windows machines that have ignored my specification of > > > the broadcast address and used their own. As a result, the > > > address I thought I had to use for broadcast ... didn't. > > > > That's a good point. I've got windows95 (2), ME (1) , 2000 (1) and > > linux (1) on four machines I'll try a variety of mixes for servers > > and clients and see what happens. The network functions are built > > into the linux kernel. I have no idea what Gates and MS have done! > > Not sure I want to find out ;-) > > Since you have a Linux machine, you'll likely find the tcpdump(8) > program quite useful in determining what's actually happening out > there on the LAN. Type "man tcpdump" for more info. It's quite > powerful for snooping on the LAN to debug problems such as this. > > Derrell If you have X11 setup, I'd suggest using ethereal[1]. I find it much easier to inspect what's going on with ethereal than I do with tcpdump. [1] http://www.ethereal.com/ -- Cameron Moore |