Re: [Flightgear-devel] If everybody had an ocean...

[Arnt K. <ar...@c2...>]

On 01 Sep 2001 10:40:26 -0400, Derrell Lipman 
<Der...@Un...> wrote in
<r8t...@co...>:

> Arnt Karlsen <ar...@c2...> writes:
> 
> > On 31 Aug 2001 17:36:54 -0400, 
> > Derrell Lipman <Der...@Un...> wrote in
> > <vgj...@co...>:
> > 
> > > "Curtis L. Olson" <cu...@fl...> writes:
> > > 
> > > > Gene Buckle writes:
> > > > > Me, I'm holding out for Kangaroos that shoot Stinger missiles. :)
> > > > 
> > > > You know that we will have to eventually explicitely impliment that.
> > > > It's just not an option. :-)
> > > 
> > > And how about the penguins that fall over backwards when you fly over
> > > them? :-)
> > 
> > ..actually, they don't.  ;-)
> 
> Right.  And Kangaroos *actually* shoot Stinger missiles. :-)
> 

...if you re-use troop sim code as in this cool Aussie-USAF demo myth. 
;-)


On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 12:40:09 -0400, 
"Norman Vine" <nh...@ca...> wrote in 
<000d01c13304$c4bb9cc0$a300a8c0@nhv>:

>  Arnt Karlsen writes:
> 
> >..when we get to this stage of development, we might use 
> >some sim code for the wintendo bluescreens.  ;-)
> 
> Yup,  and we better package up a .fli 
>  so that those with redhat can see them :-))

...on doing sub sonic low passes past some office building.  ;-)

..Derrel, Norman, both of you guys meant to post?

..do we have anyone following up on the 'Red Hat problem'?
My understanding is this is a gcc + Mesa + X + plib mismatch 
of some sort.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)

  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.