Menu
▾
▴
flexcp-devel — Discussion list for developers of FlexCP
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(54) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Wouter de V. <wo...@af...> - 2004-09-28 12:56:04
|
Shimon wrote: > pushy mean to be pushy to get stuff done by the deadline like how > gnome does it if one project is behind and one dev is really busy that > will mean the project maniger will need to go out hunting for devs. As you know, all our developers are volunteers. We're doing this for fun and I would certainly not like it if someone started to push me. Just my €0.02 Kind regards, Wouter de Vries aka wdv |
|
From: Shimon <sh...@gm...> - 2004-09-28 03:04:37
|
pushy mean to be pushy to get stuff done by the deadline like how gnome does it if one project is behind and one dev is really busy that will mean the project maniger will need to go out hunting for devs. ------ sorry i had to reemail this as one time i think it didnt goto the mailing list |
|
From: Shimon <sh...@gm...> - 2004-09-28 02:58:08
|
i was going to start a new project called fpanel as you guys looked DEAD. i fund a few spondors and devs can you make a new section in you forus for people who want to aply to be devs? and i'll send the sponsores your way and i'll change fpanel to an add-on to flexcp which will basicly be a script installer On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:19:49 -0700, Jonathan Haskins <jha...@ki...> wrote: > I kinda read that wrong, I see now that j@ckrabbit meant flexcp 2.0 > would be based on the current flexcp codebase. I have no problem with > that but I kinda think our time would be better spent working on flexcp > rather than maintaining a webcp/flexcp .5/1.0. Anyway, disregard my last > message, I personally have no preference as far as this is concerned. > > > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 18:22 -0700, Jonathan Haskins wrote: > > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using > > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out > > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would > > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because > > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more > > complicated to program it. > > > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is > > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the > > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other things > > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots of > > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel much > > incentive at this point. > > > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: > > > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both > > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP > > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release > > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. > > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with > > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the > > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > -- From the desk of shimon. |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jha...@ki...> - 2004-09-28 02:26:34
|
The cvs semi works right now but it does not handle a disconnect/reconnect situation correctly right now. It's usable but after awhile it will time out (as it should) and when you reload for the first time it fails to recognize it's been disconnected and comes up with errors about not being able to talk to the server. On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 21:32 -0400, Jason Kendall wrote: > John, If you can get something started that semi works, I wouldn't mind > working towards making it rock solid. Or at least a RFC that relates to > that communication, and where you where heading with it so we can pull > it all together. > > . > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:18 PM > > To: fle...@li... > > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > > > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using > > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out > > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would > > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because > > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more > > complicated to program it. > > > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is > > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the > > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other > things > > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots > of > > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel > much > > incentive at this point. > > > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like > this: > > > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for > both > > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of > Web-CP > > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next > release > > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., > etc. > > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently > with > > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that > the > > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement > on > > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > > _______________________________________________ > > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > > fle...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement > on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jha...@ki...> - 2004-09-28 02:20:08
|
I kinda read that wrong, I see now that j@ckrabbit meant flexcp 2.0 would be based on the current flexcp codebase. I have no problem with that but I kinda think our time would be better spent working on flexcp rather than maintaining a webcp/flexcp .5/1.0. Anyway, disregard my last message, I personally have no preference as far as this is concerned. On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 18:22 -0700, Jonathan Haskins wrote: > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more > complicated to program it. > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other things > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots of > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel much > incentive at this point. > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > |
|
From: Jason K. <jak...@mo...> - 2004-09-28 01:32:19
|
John, If you can get something started that semi works, I wouldn't mind working towards making it rock solid. Or at least a RFC that relates to that communication, and where you where heading with it so we can pull it all together. . > -----Original Message----- > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Haskins > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:18 PM > To: fle...@li... > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] FlexCP + Web-CP integration > > The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using > it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out > the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would > actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the > portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. > > Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because > it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any > further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started > from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more > complicated to program it. > > What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is > needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the > front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other things > which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I > might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots of > time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel much > incentive at this point. > > On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: > > > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both > > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP > > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release > > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. > > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with > > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the > > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jha...@ki...> - 2004-09-28 01:22:46
|
The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more complicated to program it. What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other things which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots of time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel much incentive at this point. On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jon...@ki...> - 2004-09-28 01:18:12
|
The web://cp code base has problems though, we already discussed using it for the base for flexcp and it was voted not to. So if we throw out the flexcp code which is newer and better than the webcp code we would actually be taking a step back. We would still have to rewrite the portions dealing with multi-server, modules, and virtual users. Now admittedly webcp is further along than flexcp, but that is because it is simpler in it's current stat. webcp cannot easily be taken any further without almost a complete rewrite anyway. flexcp was started from the beginning to be flexible, and as a result of that it is more complicated to program it. What we really need is for someone to take the 20 hours or so that is needed, and complete the work I started on the socket code between the front end and backend. Make it rock solid so we can work on other things which will share more common code with the webcp code base. Maybe I might take another shot at it but I have to say I've already put lots of time coding and trouble shooting into that section so I don't feel much incentive at this point. On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 17:23 -0500, j@ckrabbit wrote: > I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and > FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: > > 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both > projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. > 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP > (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release > of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. > 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on > FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with > FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. > > Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the > Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. > > What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > |
|
From: <j...@ck...> - 2004-09-28 00:24:53
|
I wanted to throw an idea out there for integrating the Web-CP and FlexCP hosting control panel projects. It would go something like this: 1. Web-cp would be renamed to FlexCP. All development work for both projects would be done under the FlexCP banner. 2. FlexCP Version 1.0 would basically be just a final release of Web-CP (if it can ever get to that point). So beginning now the next release of web-cp would actually be FlexCP 0.5.4 then FlexCP 0.6.0 etc., etc. 3. Development work for FlexCP 2.0 would begin with the coding on FlexCP done to date and would continue to be worked on concurrently with FlexCP 0.x-1.0.x. It's first release could be something like 2.0.1. Basically this idea would be something akin to the direction that the Apache project has taken with its 1.x and 2.0.x projects. What do people think... Pros ??? Cons ??? |
|
From: Jason K. <jak...@mo...> - 2004-09-27 23:37:25
|
Ahh yes, Stimulation is good. I've been thinking just not emailing this for a couple weeks now. Needed to be done.. Thanks. . > -----Original Message----- > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Dennis Bollyn > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 11:49 AM > To: fle...@li... > Subject: [FlexCP-devel] Re: why is there no activty in flexcp? > > (I'm CC'ing this to the mailing lsit because other devs might be > interested in this also) > > There is currently very little activity indeed. I don't know the reason > for other people, so I'm > speaking only for myself. I'm having a lot of other work and flexcp isn't > something high obn my > priority list. I'm doing this pure on goodwill because I'm not able to use > it for anything. > > I'm pretty certain all the other devs would agree with me that more > developers are what this > project needs. There was a stall with a seemingly unsolvable bug in the > webserver, I'm not sure if > this has been resolved already. > > I'm not sure that being pushy is a good quality for a project manager in > an open source project. > Most people contribute when they have time and pushing them might decreese > their interest in it. > > Nonetheless I hope this will give the entire project the hard needed boost > to something usable. > > Regards, > Dennis Bollyn > > --- shimon <shi...@us...> wrote: > > > Message body follows: > > > > BS"D > > hi my name is shimon. > > i like your project and i am willing to help it by making a > > debs/rpms script installer donating money and making sure > > this project stays alive. i hear you need more devs well i > > been asking around and i got a few people already which said > > they will help so if you make me a project maniger i'll make > > sure those people join and this project will get the follow > > pros to it: > > atleast 4 more devs > > some money coming in > > more awerness > > a kid which is a very good project maniger according to his > > teacher beacuase he is very pushy to get every done by the > > road map set.... > > read more here http://www.web-cp.net/forums/ftopic88.php > > sorry i need to call up united right now and see if i can > > get a ticket for tomz to usa after i got the ticket i'll be > > free. (already packed) > > sorry i cant edit. > > > > -- > > This message has been sent to you, a registered SourceForge.net user, > > by another site user, through the SourceForge.net site. This message > > has been delivered to your SourceForge.net mail alias. You may reply > > to this message using the "Reply" feature of your email client, or > > using the messaging facility of SourceForge.net at: > > https://sourceforge.net/sendmessage.php?touser=1021657 > > > > > ===== > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 > Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on > who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. > Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel |
|
From: <j...@ck...> - 2004-09-27 16:34:49
|
I am currently using web-cp successfully (albeit on a very small scale) and I have a vested interest in seeing the project progress (either in the form of web-cp or FlexCP). I've got a couple little pieces of code and a skin floating around that I would like to see added in at some point. Mostly aesthetic stuff, but also a decent integration with the dovecot IMAP server. Basically, I would like to write some code for FlexCP, but as my skills are limited, I don't really think I have much to contribute to the core functionality issues that still have to be resolved. j@ckrabbit > There is currently very little activity indeed. I don't know the reason for other people, so I'm > speaking only for myself. I'm having a lot of other work and flexcp isn't something high obn my > priority list. I'm doing this pure on goodwill because I'm not able to use it for anything. |
|
From: Wouter de V. <wo...@af...> - 2004-09-27 16:02:18
|
Dennis Bollyn wrote: > There is currently very little activity indeed. I don't know the reason for other people, so I'm > speaking only for myself. I'm having a lot of other work and flexcp isn't something high obn my > priority list. I'm doing this pure on goodwill because I'm not able to use it for anything. Same here. Although I could use it, I don't need it fast because I already use another paid control panel. > I'm pretty certain all the other devs would agree with me that more developers are what this > project needs. There was a stall with a seemingly unsolvable bug in the webserver, I'm not sure if > this has been resolved already. No idea either. Need... more... devs :) > I'm not sure that being pushy is a good quality for a project manager in an open source project. > Most people contribute when they have time and pushing them might decreese their interest in it. Well in this case it isn't really bad to shake some people awake ;) > Nonetheless I hope this will give the entire project the hard needed boost to something usable. Busy right now with some stuff, but it would certainly stimulate me if there's some activity. Kind regards, Wouter de Vries aka wdv |
|
From: Dennis B. <gy...@ya...> - 2004-09-27 15:49:22
|
(I'm CC'ing this to the mailing lsit because other devs might be interested in this also) There is currently very little activity indeed. I don't know the reason for other people, so I'm speaking only for myself. I'm having a lot of other work and flexcp isn't something high obn my priority list. I'm doing this pure on goodwill because I'm not able to use it for anything. I'm pretty certain all the other devs would agree with me that more developers are what this project needs. There was a stall with a seemingly unsolvable bug in the webserver, I'm not sure if this has been resolved already. I'm not sure that being pushy is a good quality for a project manager in an open source project. Most people contribute when they have time and pushing them might decreese their interest in it. Nonetheless I hope this will give the entire project the hard needed boost to something usable. Regards, Dennis Bollyn --- shimon <shi...@us...> wrote: > Message body follows: > > BS"D > hi my name is shimon. > i like your project and i am willing to help it by making a > debs/rpms script installer donating money and making sure > this project stays alive. i hear you need more devs well i > been asking around and i got a few people already which said > they will help so if you make me a project maniger i'll make > sure those people join and this project will get the follow > pros to it: > atleast 4 more devs > some money coming in > more awerness > a kid which is a very good project maniger according to his > teacher beacuase he is very pushy to get every done by the > road map set.... > read more here http://www.web-cp.net/forums/ftopic88.php > sorry i need to call up united right now and see if i can > get a ticket for tomz to usa after i got the ticket i'll be > free. (already packed) > sorry i cant edit. > > -- > This message has been sent to you, a registered SourceForge.net user, > by another site user, through the SourceForge.net site. This message > has been delivered to your SourceForge.net mail alias. You may reply > to this message using the "Reply" feature of your email client, or > using the messaging facility of SourceForge.net at: > https://sourceforge.net/sendmessage.php?touser=1021657 > ===== __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Dennis B. <gy...@ya...> - 2004-06-30 06:21:24
|
I'm glad that's sorted out. I assume everything works now? This is good news, because those wo were working on fixing the bug can now move on to other things. On a related note, we now have a wiki that can be used for several things: http://flexcp.sourceforge.net/wiki/ --- Jonathan Haskins <jha...@ki...> wrote: > I think I found out why '&' in the transaction ID was stalling the > socket code before it was removed from the list of possible characters. > It was being encoded correctly in the send_message() function, but in > flexcp.php when replying it was not being encoded. Thus it caused > send_message() to hang while trying to receive it. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > ===== __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jha...@ki...> - 2004-06-30 03:10:56
|
I think I found out why '&' in the transaction ID was stalling the socket code before it was removed from the list of possible characters. It was being encoded correctly in the send_message() function, but in flexcp.php when replying it was not being encoded. Thus it caused send_message() to hang while trying to receive it. |
|
From: Dennis B. <gy...@ya...> - 2004-06-28 07:44:49
|
I should be home the entire day, but I have to leave for a while in the evening (local time, that is). This gives me a window of about 1PM GMT to 2AM GMT or something, with a small gap around 4PM GMT. --- Jonathan Haskins <jha...@ki...> wrote: > How about we set up a meeting on IRC to discuss our plan over the next > few weeks/months? What time would everyone be able to show up? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > ===== __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jha...@ki...> - 2004-06-28 01:40:07
|
How about we set up a meeting on IRC to discuss our plan over the next few weeks/months? What time would everyone be able to show up? |
|
From: Dennis B. <gy...@ya...> - 2004-06-25 06:12:45
|
OK, nevermind I found the link. I AM blind. --- Jonathan Haskins <jha...@ki...> wrote: > > > PDrake sent: > > I have set up a discussion board at http://www.web-cp.net/forums. I > will > > need to have some people who can be the moderators for this message > board > >as I will not have time to fully moderate it. If you are interested or > >know of any good candidates, please let me know. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > ===== __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo |
|
From: Dennis B. <gy...@ya...> - 2004-06-25 06:11:01
|
I woudln't mind being a moderator either, I frequented the webcp board before. The webcp forums were pretty good, I don't think many people noticed there were no moderators around anymore. Just one thing though, is it possible that there are no registration link anywhere, or am I just blind? --- Jonathan Haskins <jha...@ki...> wrote: > > > PDrake sent: > > I have set up a discussion board at http://www.web-cp.net/forums. I > will > > need to have some people who can be the moderators for this message > board > >as I will not have time to fully moderate it. If you are interested or > >know of any good candidates, please let me know. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > ===== __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: Andy S. <new...@at...> - 2004-06-24 19:05:42
|
I'd be interested in being a moderator / co-moderator. > > > PDrake sent: >> I have set up a discussion board at http://www.web-cp.net/forums. I > will >> need to have some people who can be the moderators for this message > board >>as I will not have time to fully moderate it. If you are interested or >>know of any good candidates, please let me know. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > |
|
From: Jonathan H. <jha...@ki...> - 2004-06-24 18:29:06
|
PDrake sent: > I have set up a discussion board at http://www.web-cp.net/forums. I will > need to have some people who can be the moderators for this message board >as I will not have time to fully moderate it. If you are interested or >know of any good candidates, please let me know. |
|
From: <lup...@gm...> - 2004-06-24 09:46:24
|
This is a good idea! On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:34:32 -0700 (PDT) Dennis Bollyn <gy...@ya...> wrote: > I'm making a special list for webcp related material right now, this way we can keep this list for > FlexCP development and still take on the refugees ;-). It's called "flexcp-webcp", you should > subscribe to it as soon as it becomes active. > > --- Jonathan Haskins <jon...@ki...> wrote: > > I noticed the high volume of web://cp related traffic and was thinking > > it's kind of out of place. But until an official web://cp project shows > > up with a mailing list or forum feel free to use the list. We'll take > > you guys on as refugees :) > > > > On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 12:31, Andy Stein wrote: > > > That's just it, the whole /home folders area is all 755 root.root. I used > > > the web interface to create the users. > > > > > > I'm sorry if I'm posting to the wrong area. Wasn't sure where else to > > > post. We can work on this where ever is best. > > > > > > > I would suggest to get a pencil and scratch paper and go through and > > > > write out all the permissions for the users/groups/directories you are > > > > interested in > > > > and the build on that. > > > > > > > > In general I am not sure how much the intention of this list is to help > > > > troubleshoot > > > > webcp installation/usage issues (???). FlexCP developers, would you like > > > > for this > > > > list to be a webcp/flexcp catchall while the webcp community regroups? > > > > > > > > Or perhaps I could help you resolve the issue on this thread: > > > > http://forum.hostinghacks.net/viewtopic.php?t=112 > > > > and then we could summarize and post the results here to aid the FlexCP > > > > team in > > > > future design? > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > ===== > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > |
|
From: Dennis B. <gy...@ya...> - 2004-06-24 09:34:38
|
I'm making a special list for webcp related material right now, this way we can keep this list for FlexCP development and still take on the refugees ;-). It's called "flexcp-webcp", you should subscribe to it as soon as it becomes active. --- Jonathan Haskins <jon...@ki...> wrote: > I noticed the high volume of web://cp related traffic and was thinking > it's kind of out of place. But until an official web://cp project shows > up with a mailing list or forum feel free to use the list. We'll take > you guys on as refugees :) > > On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 12:31, Andy Stein wrote: > > That's just it, the whole /home folders area is all 755 root.root. I used > > the web interface to create the users. > > > > I'm sorry if I'm posting to the wrong area. Wasn't sure where else to > > post. We can work on this where ever is best. > > > > > I would suggest to get a pencil and scratch paper and go through and > > > write out all the permissions for the users/groups/directories you are > > > interested in > > > and the build on that. > > > > > > In general I am not sure how much the intention of this list is to help > > > troubleshoot > > > webcp installation/usage issues (???). FlexCP developers, would you like > > > for this > > > list to be a webcp/flexcp catchall while the webcp community regroups? > > > > > > Or perhaps I could help you resolve the issue on this thread: > > > http://forum.hostinghacks.net/viewtopic.php?t=112 > > > and then we could summarize and post the results here to aid the FlexCP > > > team in > > > future design? > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > ===== __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: Dennis B. <gy...@ya...> - 2004-06-24 09:27:19
|
I think a wiki would be good. I personally don't like *nukes because they don't really allow you to make a real website. They are useful for a portal of some sorts though. --- Jason Kendall <jak...@mo...> wrote: > Ok, I'll look at CMS systems.. don't know how far you want to go.. maybe > wikki style or slashcode, or so big like php-nuke ish? > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: fle...@li... [mailto:flexcp-devel- > > ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Dennis Bollyn > > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 3:28 PM > > To: fle...@li... > > Subject: Re: [FlexCP-devel] Current CVS on SF. > > > > That should probably be changed, yes. We have changed the copyright on > > files we wrote from > > scratch. AFAIK, files from webcp still have to original copyright > notice. > > There is space reserved > > for contributors to place their name and email. > > > > Coding wise, there is still a lot of work. You could probably start > > writing modules, but the hooks > > interface (yes, that's supposed to be my work) isn't finished yet. > I'll > > get the latest CVS and > > start doing some coding. > > > > After that, I'll try to write up some simple docs about the template > and > > hooks system. BTW, I > > really think we need a CMS of some sort to update the website. This > would > > make small changed a lot > > less dificult. > > > > --- Jason Kendall <jak...@co...> wrote: > > > Just playing and looking though CVS.. Found a few things. > > > > > > In file: /web/language/english.phps (I think) > > > $T['flexcp license'] > > > > > > Should this not go to our own license now? It's still pointing to > webcp. > > > Are we changing the Copyright on the files to only include FlexCP > > > related info since we have basically decided to move to new ground? > > > > > > Also, Where are we? I mean, in coding. Are we able to start building > > > working modules? Do we have docs to help write modules/templates? > Sorry, > > > been busy and need to catch up. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jay > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ===== > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! > > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > > _______________________________________________ > > flexcp-devel mailing list > > fle...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. > Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - > digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, > unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com > _______________________________________________ > flexcp-devel mailing list > fle...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flexcp-devel > ===== __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail |
|
From: <ya...@qw...> - 2004-06-24 08:47:05
|
Dear all, The init-script is no problem at all, see attachments! /etc/init.d/webcp -> starts the webcp daemon, nothing fancy, just make sure you change DAEMONDIR accordingly! It should be installdirofwebcp/server/, given that webcp.php (the daemon) still resides in that directory. /etc/init.d/apache-webcp -> starts an apache instant for webcp, the daemon is /usr/sbin/apache-webcp, create it with the following command: ln -s /usr/sbin/apache /usr/sbin/apache-webcp Now the proper way of starting these scripts at boot-time on Debian is: update-rc.d webcp defaults update-rc.d apache-webcp defaults Good luck with it! -- Best regards, Yavuz Aydin Qweb Internet Services Citeren Justin <ju...@li...>: > From: <lup...@gm...> > > WebCP works fine but i have some problems... server status don't show the > service that are up... and other little bug... > > Anyone that can help me to write a doc for installing webcp under debian > woody? > > The instructions I have written here: > http://redhat.hostinghacks.net/webcp.html don't actually depend on redhat > very much. All software is compiled from source and the only place you > should run into problems if you try it on Debian is with the init scripts. > So if you tweak the init scripts for Debian (or just omit them and start > webcp manually) I think it should work. I will download Debian this week and > start a new forum at forum.hostinghacks.net for Debian information. If you > want to try to run through it and post where there are problems then I will > try to fix them. > > j@ckrabbit |
