Re: [gnome-core] gtkmm2.4 and glibmm2.4 stable?

[<mic...@ea...>]

Le 25 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 19:13, Spundun Bhatt a =E9crit :

> Mich=E8le Garoche wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 23 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 20:37, Spundun Bhatt a =E9crit :
>>
>>> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am not a big gnome user, but I have no objections to moving the=20=

>>>> whole thing to stable. Dave might though, he's likely to be the one=20=

>>>> to build the binary distribution. Are there any known problems with=20=

>>>> what is currently in unstable that would stop him from doing so?
>>>
>>>
>>> I hate to bring this up.. but the gnome trash does not work for me.
>>
>> It's a known bug, Nautilus not conforming to the FreeDesktop spec=20
>> (newer), in 2.10 also, see thread on gnome devel dated 15 February=20
>> 2005 and older ones also.
>
> Hmmm.
> When I start a gnome session.. and in the gnome desktop when I try to=20=

> drag a document to gnome-trash ( :) ).. nothing happens..... what has=20=

> that got to do with nautilus not conforming to the fd.o spec?
Simply because the name used for the gnome-trash is not conforming to=20
the freedesktop spec which is used all over gnome for mime types,=20
etc.., especially for the gnome panel which includes the trash and=20
which is handled by Nautilus through gnome-vfs.

Anyway, it works for me though as far as deleting files and emptying it=20=

are concerned (I think I've modified something somewhere just to get=20
the trash working, but don't remember what and where exactly - maybe=20
some sort of mapping /sym linking with kde where trash works), but not=20=

for viewing the contents of the gnome trash, for which I get a "trash:"=20=

is not a valid location" warning dialog message. See the=20
docs/nautilus-internals.pdf in source.

Mich=E8le
<http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>