Re: [Fink-i18n] [TRANSLATE] web/xml/packaging packaging.en.xml,1.46,1.48

[<mic...@ea...>]

Le 7 sept. 2004, =E0 14:02, Daniel Macks a =E9crit :

> packaging manual additions:
>
>   * Revision field: add notes about Revision field incrementing
>
>  +<p>
> +  This
> +  includes changing the <code>Depends</code> or other package lists,
> +  with the exception of<code>BuildDepends</code>, and adding,
> +  removing, or renaming splitoff packages or shifting files among
> +  them.
Could it be rephrased so that in case of building correctly a package,=20=

but the built is not correct (i.e. missing a crucial builddepends), it=20=

will be clear that the revision number should be increased when the=20
BuildDepends field changes. Otherwise the user has not chance to see=20
its package updated, unless he knows the info file has silently=20
changed.

For example, I think about missing shared-mime-info, which does not=20
impede the build of the package, but impedes the user to add new=20
filters.

Mich=E8le
<http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>