From: Alexander H. <ale...@gm...> - 2012-12-05 02:12:42
|
On 12/4/12 7:07 PM, BABA Yoshihiko wrote: > Dear > > > I am creating a new package "qgis18-py26". Up to 1.7.x, qgis used > dynamic libraries, and 1.8.0 adopts frameworks, with one dylib remaining. > > My question is, if I should create -shlibs splitoff or not. In such > case, the -shlibs splitoff have the leftover dylib, or have the whole > frameworks as well? > > Attached are my .info files (as well as two new packages qgis18-py > depends on). > > Thanks > -- > BABA Yoshihiko > http://www.uclmail.net/users/babayoshihiko > > The libraries inside frameworks are still shared libraries, so I'd say divide the frameworks up between the -shlibs and the -dev appropriately. For example, the real libraries and any versioned symlinks would go in the -shlibs, and unversioned symlinks would go in the -dev with the headers. -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison My package updates: http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ |