From: Sjors G. <sj...@sj...> - 2012-06-29 15:44:01
|
Op 29-06-12 17:38, Alexander Hansen schreef: > On 6/29/12 6:14 AM, TheSin wrote: >> I agree that it does not need to be essential at all, but that being said new versions of dpkg in the future will require tex for install-info since its being deprecated for ginstall-info upstream so maybe we need to look at debs of debs? I'll re-work debianutils today and split it up I should be able to make it 2 pkgs and break out po4a I did it for the new dpkg already. BTW po4a is the po translator Debian now uses on all essentials. >> > > Meh. If dpkg upstream is using TeX instead of the old install-info > that's going to be really painful for our purposes. _They_ can do that > since they're fundamentally a provider of prebuilt binaries, and aren't > forcing all of _their_ users to install TeX. > > I wonder if there's a lighter-weight option we can use here... I'll check how much of TexInfo is actually needed to get just the ginstall-info binary. Sjors |