From: Alexander H. <ale...@gm...> - 2011-11-14 16:19:45
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/14/11 10:37 AM, Max Horn wrote: > > Am 03.11.2011 um 13:47 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > >> I was thinking that it might be useful for fink to allow other >> Types besides Type: perl, e.g. Type: python, Type: octave, etc., >> to have their own %{default_script} options. There's a lot of >> duplication of CompileScripts and InstallScripts within the >> octave-forge modules, for example, and the python modules. > >> I'd envision having the relevant interpreter packages install >> modules within %p/lib/perl5/Fink (maybe in a >> %p/lib/perl5/Fink/Types directory?) and have the Type handler in >> fink check that directory for the installed plugins. Maybe we >> could move the Perl type handler there too. > > The basic idea of supporting more languages, and doing it in a > flexible and unified way, sounds great to me. By all means, the > perl type handler should be unified with that, too, if at all > possible. > > But I wonder if we really need "installable plugins" for this? > Don't get me wrong, I am not opposed, I just wonder whether it will > be worth the extra effort...? > > > If we allow packages to provide types, say, "Type: octave", then of > course a package would have to bdep on the package providing this > type. > > > Cheers, Max > My thought was to allow the maintainers of the script interpreter packages to change _their_ scripts without having to wait for a new Fink release. - -- Alexander Hansen, Ph.D. Fink User Liaison http://finkakh.wordpress.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7BP5cACgkQB8UpO3rKjQ9WBwCfTpLJmCyOyA+eyaTVX+mVot/s XBAAnApHDxETQnpo++Nese251F0YoRlN =gTTU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |