From: D. M. <dm...@ne...> - 2011-03-08 21:50:56
|
On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:45:19 -0500, Alexander Hansen wrote: > On 3/8/11 4:24 PM, Max Horn wrote: > > Am 08.03.2011 um 19:18 schrieb Alexander Hansen: > >> There's no mono for 64-bit, yet, and therefore there should be no > >> gmime24 (and thus no dependency on it in pan). > > > > Hum? Actually, pan does require gmime24, so I can't just remove that dependency. But I could disable pan in the 64bit trees, if not all dependencies are satisfied. > > > > Anyway, as Daniel already pointed out: Mono is not really required for anything in there -- gmime24 only needs it for bindings, and as Daniel also already wrote in another email: It should be no problem to split this into a separate package (I wouldn't put it into a "splitoff", but rather a separate package, to avoid all the extra dependencies). > > It appears that gmime24 has always had mono as a dependency, so clearly > there has been a breakdown in testing these packages. Ahh, looks like gmime changed major libversion since I last looked. The older gmime202 package (still) has --disable-mono in it, whereas the newer gmime24 supports that flag but has never used it in our packaging. dan -- Daniel Macks dm...@ne... |