From: Koen v. d. D. <koe...@gm...> - 2009-06-29 18:49:02
|
There are now two threads going on about this subject, one in -core and one in -devel. Since I don't belong to -core, I'll follow up here. On 6/29/09, Daniel Macks <dm...@ne...> wrote: > We really need to figure out whether config_data is used directly by > users (i.e., must be in PATH so can run as command) or is just invoked > by module-build-pmXXX itself (in which case it can be renamed or moved > to be orthogonal pathname among the different packages that would have > it). FWIW, I did a quick scan of all packages in unstable, and none of them (Build)Depend on module-build-pmXXX-bin. Of course that doesn't mean that there would ever be a package that doesn't. What about my earlier suggestion to move config_data out of /sw/bin into /sw/share, eg /sw/share/module-build-pmXXX/scripts/? - Koen. |