Re: [Fink-users] Broken deps for svn and db

[Daniel M. <dm...@ne...>]

On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 01:23:12PM -0400, Daniel Johnson wrote:
> 
> On Jun 20, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Alexander Hansen <ale...@gm... 
>  > wrote:
> 
> > This may be a case of bit-rot.  This version of svn was able to be  
> > built
> > at one point.  I was able to build it on my machine, but not in a
> > stable-only situation, since I was using the unstable tree versions of
> > the dependent libraries.
> >
> > It may be worth it for us to roll the current/unstable version of svn
> > over to stable, provided that the dependencies are available.
> 
> Unfortunately, libapr.0 and libaprutil.0 are needed in stable first  
> before I can move svn to stable. Those are the only dependencies that  
> are still needed.
> 
> The old svn is definitely bitrotted and I wouldn't even try to fix it.

I'm seeing some dep breakage in things on top of libapr{,util}.0, (I'm
working on it) but the .0 stuff and things below them seem fine so
"libapr{,util}.0 and their deps" could be moved imo, especially if
they fix known breakage.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
dm...@ne...
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks