Re: [Fink-users] g95 mismatch?

[Matt K. <mk...@hs...>]

Since g95 only exists in unstable, it is "new" or so it would seem?
I just did another selfupdate and it looks right now, but this seems 
counter-intuitive since fink updated the table when I switched to unstable 
(or so it said it did and obviously something made g95 appear when it 
was not in the list at all prior)?
IOW, if g95 only exists in unstable and switching to same made it appear, 
then where (and why) is fink getting the 0.50.20051215 version info.? 
Perhaps it's there but hidden in the stable tree?  Perhaps it had this 
info. from my last (stable tree) self-update and it just "appeared" when I 
switched to the unstable tree (in that case, then it's a bit misleading 
when it says that it's updating the table).  I'm confused...

Sorry for troubling the maintainer.

Thanks,
-Matt


On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, Kevin Horton wrote:

> On 31 Mar 2006, at 12:07, Matt Kozak wrote:
>> I did an update-all and then just switched my 10.4 system to unstable tree 
>> to look into using g95, but after the table updated and g95 appeared, fink 
>> (0.24.14-21) says the latest is 0.50.20051215.  I noticed that the fink 
>> online list of packages shows a newer version:
>> 0.50.20060321
>> 
>> Any idea what that's all about?
>
> Did you do another fink selfupdate after switching to the unstable tree?  If 
> you are using rsync, fink only downloads new package descriptions for the 
> currently active tree.
>
> Kevin Horton         RV-8 (finishing kit)
> Ottawa, Canada
> http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8
>
>

Matthew Kozak
Systems Programmer/Administrator
--------------------------------
Haskin Shellfish Research Lab
6959 Miller Avenue
Port Norris, NJ 08349-3167
email: mk...@hs...
phone: 856-785-0074 x4325
fax: 856-785-1544
web: http://hsrl.rutgers.edu