Re: [Fink-devel] (no subject)

[Daniel M. <dm...@ne...>]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:56:36PM +0100, Murali Vadivelu wrote:
> Dear Fink Developers,
> 
> It looks like (and I see that in my case) that DaemonicName field  
> does not expand %type to its value:
> Writing control file...
> Writing package script postinst...
> Writing package script prerm...
> Writing conffiles list...
> Writing daemonic info file denyhosts-py%type_pkg[python].xml...

Looks like a fink bug to me.

Does the same problem occur if you rely on the implicit default value
(i.e., omit the DaemonicName field from your .info file), which is
documented as being "the package name"?

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
dm...@ne...
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks