Re: [Fink-devel] Do we still need 'fink checksums'?

[David H. <dm...@us...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Daniel Macks wrote:

| The 'fink checksums' mode was added two years ago when we first
| started requiring MD5 for source tarballs. The code implementing it is
| marked:
|
|   # HACK HACK HACK
|   # This is to be removed soon again, only a temporary tool to allow
|   # checking of all available MD5 values in all packages.
|
| Does anyone still use this mode? Do we still need this functionality?
| Or can we axe it (or at least deprecate it now, then axe it soon)?
|
| dan
|
rip it baby :)

- -d

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBG0Y4PMoaMn4kKR4RAwiqAJ93QT7b8mNEFtEi1j6Wy65VredKqACfa6Os
S0W9YiPX192mCYMhEh6rcpg=
=4xcq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----