Re: [Fink-devel] binary release plans

[Jeremy H. <fi...@hi...>]

On 29 Feb 2004, at 13:12, Ben Hines wrote:

> On Feb 28, 2004, at 4:34 AM, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
>
>> OK... How come they aren't compliant? Sorry I haven't been keeping 
>> up... I've started full-time work experience, and have uni starting 
>> next week on top of that, so I've been very pre-occupied!
>>
>> Since gramps seems to work fine, I can move gnome-python2 to 
>> stable... But I still don't get the issue with gnome-python? There 
>> are already -py22 and -py23 packages for it...
>>
>
> No, there are not... not in 10.3 tree. Those are only in the 
> 10.2-gcc3.3 tree
>
> http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/gnome-python-py22
> http://fink.sourceforge.net/pdb/package.php/gnome-python-py23
>
> Any python package which doesn't comply is by definition unstable.. 
> they can easily break.
>
> -Ben
>
>

OK, well should I move gnome-python-py2* to the 10.3 tree, as well?

I still don't understand why they're not compliant with the python 
policy, though...?