[Fink-devel] Re: fink feedback?

[Daniel M. <dm...@ne...>]

dr...@ma... said:
> "Peter O'Gorman" <pe...@po...> wrote:
>> Martin Costabel wrote:
>> > More precisely: In the file atk1.info in 10.3/unstable, which is version 
>> > 1.4.1-3 and which I have installed, there is no such field. In 
>> > 10.3/stable in version 1.4.1-2, there is such a field. The fact that 
>> > this is taken into account looks like a bug.
>> 
>> I have to agree, we do not need to take older versions into account. 
>> PkgVersion.pm says ' @dependslist = $package->get_all_providers();' and 
>> loops through everything looking for something to complain about.
>> 
>> Dave, did you intend this?
> 
> Well, I didn't even consider it.  It's hard to imagine a situation, other
> than correcting a typo or a radical change in packaging, in which
> BuildDependsOnly should change from version to version.

kdelibs3-ssl suffers here. I just now got:

WARNING: The package kdelibs3-ssl Depends on kdelibs3-ssl-shlibs,
         but kdelibs3-ssl-shlibs only allows things to BuildDepend on it.

It appears 10.3/stable has BDO for -shlibs, unstable does not.

dan

-- 
Daniel Macks
dm...@ne...
http://www.netspace.org/~dmacks