Re: [Fink-devel] Package naming..(Max? )

[Max H. <ma...@qu...>]

Am Montag, 01.12.03 um 23:27 Uhr schrieb Darian Lanx:

[...]
>>>
>> IMHO that name would easily lead to confusion. Why not "gnupg-alpha" 
>> or "gnupg-testing" etc.?
> Because it is neither really testing nor is it alpha code. It is a 
> development branch we does run reliably stable, it is just not meant 
> for production because it usual has many experimental features of the 
> OpenPGP standard. Thus it would be hard to support all those if it 
> went into the stable branch too quickly.
>
> thus my dilemma
It's don't see the dilemma. This is *precisely* what "gnupg-testing" 
means.

Max