From: Rhythmic F. <rfi...@gm...> - 2007-02-10 15:41:07
|
> From: Jacques Carette <ca...@mc...> > skaller wrote: > >> P.S. What's a monad? > >> > The easiest way to understand monads (to me!) is as follows: it is a > mechanism that, given a particular context, tells you how to "string > together" computations in that context without have to do all the > plumbing yourself. [...] > Another introduction like by many is Cale Gibbard's > http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Monads_as_containers Thanks, I like the fruity example too. So, which parts of felix are "functorial"? |