[Edumips64-commit] SF.net SVN: edumips64:[642] paper/ieee-tedu/survey.tex

[<sv...@ed...>]

Revision: 642
          https://www.edumips.org/changeset/642
Author:   dpatti
Date:     2011-10-11 09:40:10 +0200 (Tue, 11 Oct 2011)
Log Message:
-----------
- Removed two courses reference
- Removed clarification about data used for Fig.3 (is useless now)

Modified Paths:
--------------
    paper/ieee-tedu/survey.tex

Modified: paper/ieee-tedu/survey.tex
===================================================================
--- paper/ieee-tedu/survey.tex	2011-10-10 18:51:53 UTC (rev 641)
+++ paper/ieee-tedu/survey.tex	2011-10-11 07:40:10 UTC (rev 642)
@@ -14,8 +14,7 @@
 \end{itemize}
 
 An online form was created~\cite{edumips64_form} , involving a total
-of  93 students belonging to 4 different
-courses~\cite{course_unict,course_unikore,course_ferrara,course_mcgill}.
+of  93 students belonging to undergraduate computer architecture courses~\cite{course_unict,course_unikore}.
 The main goal of the proposed questions was to capture the perceived
 effectiveness of the \EM{} tool and the adopted methodology, the usage
 frequency, and impact on the learning of several key topics of
@@ -84,9 +83,7 @@
 \end{figure}
 Finally, Figure~\ref{fig:percentage_of_success} shows how the average
 percentage of success is distributed across the number of attempts
-required to pass the final examination. Note that this data were
-only available for the course~\cite{course_unict}, where the tool
-\EM{} was initially developed. As can be observed, although the
+required to pass the final examination. As can be observed, although the
 fraction of students requiring three or more attempts is not particularly
 affected, the adoption of the methodology since 2008 seems to increase
 the number of students that successfully pass the first examination,