Re: [E1000-devel] BUG? strange behavior with vlans and virtual functions on i350 -- possible solution

[Chris F. <chr...@ge...>]

On 11/16/2012 08:45 AM, Chris Friesen wrote:
> Are you eventually going to be adding the IGBVF_FLAG_RX_LB_VLAN_BSWAP
> flag to the mainline igbvf driver or should I also send in a patch for
> that?
>
> I am a bit curious about the endianness thing. The datasheets for both
> the 82576 and i350 state that the VLAN tag is in network byte order, but
> the igbvf driver calls le16_to_cpu() for the normal case and only uses
> be16_to_cpu() for the errata case. Am I missing a byte-swap along the
> way somewhere, or are both the datasheets wrong?

Hi all,

I figured I'd bump the thread since I haven't seen a response to either 
of the above.  Not urgent, just curious.

Chris