|
From: Jay V. <fu...@us...> - 2009-03-27 19:43:44
|
Support Team <su...@ca...> wrote: >Yes, same VLAN setup in the software does not work for 82546 chip. The >setup in software are identical, >other than 82546 load E1000 driver and 82573 load E1000E driver, nothing >else changed in software or >test environment. If we can see 82546/MT adapter can get 2GB/s in bond >mode, we will be happy. Some bonding things to check: ip route show Make sure no interfaces (the slaves) have routes that supercede the route for the bond itself. cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0 [or whatever bond device you have] Make sure the options you think you have match what bonding is seeing (particularly the xmit_hash_policy if your throughput test is many connections but not many discrete peers). Also in the proc file, make sure the 802.3ad is aggregating properly; are all of the slaves in the active aggregator? Lastly, what distro (cat /etc/issue) and kernel version are you running (uname -a)? I fixed a bug in 802.3ad related to aggregator assignments a couple of weeks ago. If you've got a sufficiently recent kernel (the bug was introduced late last year), you might be seeing that (if the slaves don't aggregate properly). I observed the bug messing up 802.3ad aggregations with my e1000 devices, so it might be that. -J --- -Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, fu...@us... |