|
From: Joe P. <jo...@pe...> - 2008-03-31 19:10:55
|
On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 11:36 -0700, Kok, Auke wrote: > yes and I even tried pushing for a generic netdev printk that incorporates the > msg_enable bits properly > > I also got absolutely unwelcome responses to that, if not none :) http://www.mail-archive.com/ne...@vg.../msg40070.html It still makes sense to me. I think the overall amount of churn is low, readability would improve, existing errors in msg_enable would be eliminated during the churn and the newly introduced error rate would be lower. |