From: Simon L. <si...@li...> - 2010-09-05 18:48:39
|
On 5 September 2010 11:32, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ld...@ge...> wrote: >> Are you in a position to say if the XML format is acceptable? > > I’m not sure at this stage. I would like to see something more dynamic, > matching what’s in principle possible with the full power of subpicture > streams. This page <http://www.mpucoder.com/guides/subpic3.html> claims > that subpicture commands can be processed at the full video frame rate; > it would be nice to be able to demonstrate what’s possible with that. > I do agree with this. Do you intend to keep the xml backward compatible? This is definitely a bigger change than adding a control command. In summary I see the full features as each spu to be able to have multiple pictures and multiple control sequences used at different delays. I think it may require a new xml format to take advantage of all the available features. Perhaps a more literal translation of the spu stream with the ability to implement all control sequence commands in the xml. I will happily help get these features added but I'd like to see CHG_COLCON added to the supported commands in it's current incarnation first. (Maybe 0.7.01?) Si. |