|
From: Beni C. <cb...@us...> - 2005-01-21 01:07:30
|
Alan G Isaac wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Beni Cherniavsky apparently wrote:
>
>>>There is a lot of information that
>>>is associate to the Author more than it is general to the document, so
>>>maybe there should be a way to associate the various fields somehow.
>
>>Probably but I can't think of a convenient syntax. Alternating
>>author/contact/organization/address fields will do for now.
>
> And possibly 'position'?
>
No technical problem to add it. The one thing that bother me is that it's not
an `officially defined field`__. It works, of course, as any "unregistered"
field - but I'm not sure about adding special handling to a field without
making it official.
This gives another example of why it would be god to attach fields to authors.
What about the following syntax:
:Author: Foo Fred
:Organization: Food Foomatics & Friends
:Contact: fo...@fo...
Which parses (before the docinfo transform) as:
<field_list>
<field>
<field_name>
Author
<field_body>
<paragraph>
Foo Fred
<field_list>
<field>
<field_name>
Organization
<field_body>
<paragraph>
Food Foomatics & Friends
<field>
<field_name>
Contact
<field_body>
<paragraph>
<reference refuri="mailto:fo...@fo...">
fo...@fo...
I propose that this should give:
<docinfo>
<author>
Foo Fred
<organization>
Food Foomatics & Friends
<contact>
<reference refuri="mailto:fo...@fo...">
fo...@fo...
That is, <author> elements will be allowed to contain other bibliographic
elements.
--
Beni Cherniavsky <cb...@us...>, who can only read email on weekends.
|