From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2007-06-01 15:42:06
|
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, "G. Milde" apparently wrote: > After David's statement that parsing of a code-block > should happen in the docutils reader, I assume this as > existent part of a specification of a future ``.. > code-block::`` directive. Yes. I did not have enough context when I used that name. I apologize for any resulting confusion. > I don't see the need for an additional non-parsing > directive. And I see the proposal of a non-parsing > directive under the name "code-block" as confusing. But what do you think about my two requests (in my last message)? Are these problematic or reasonable? And my final question? Thank you, Alan Isaac |