From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2006-10-06 20:52:12
|
Oh, one more thing, since we're talking about problems ... You cannot simply divide up the linewidth for tables the way you do, since you are making the **field** widths add up to 100% but a table uses space for other things too! (Like default spacing between fields.) Tables with several fields end up being far too wide. Turning this into a more general reST issue: please consider adding two possibilities. The first:: :widths: 0 to indicate no imposition of field-width considerations. The second:: :widths: 10 to indicate all field-width are 10% (for example) of the total table width (rather than having to write a width for each field. Also, allow specifying the total table width. This would be very helpful! Thank you, Alan Isaac |