Re: [Docutils-develop] Re: Testing of writers

[Lele G. <le...@na...>]

>>>>> Felix Wiemann l'ha dit:

    Felix> Using reST-input would in fact mean testing everything.
    Felix> However, I was actually only concerned about the writers.
    Felix> But if we can get more of it, it's fine.

This reminds me an idea, maybe not so crazy: what about having a reST
*writer*, and then use that as a shortcut to test the whole loop?

Yes, I know it's still not enough:

a) requires another piece of code [1]_

b) won't help much in testing the other writers [2]_

c) it may be very/too difficult reach a 100% two-way process.

ciao, lele.

.. [1] but it'd be a *valuable* piece:
       - a nice way of programmatically *producing* reST sources
       - we'd be able to read, elaborate and rewrite reST docs
       - natural completion of the framework

.. [2] but it would for the writers API.
--=20
nickname: Lele Gaifax	| Quando vivr=C3=B2 di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas	| comincer=C3=B2 ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
email: le...@se...	|		-- Fortunato Depero, 1929.