From: Felix W. <Fel...@gm...> - 2004-05-13 17:28:33
|
David Goodger wrote: > Felix Wiemann wrote: > >> David Goodger wrote: >> >>> I don't understand how it will be decided to call a release >>> "stable". Who decides it's "stable", and how? >> >> Who: We, the subcribers of docutils-develop. > > It seems that you pretty much unilaterally decided that 0.3 was > "stable" and 0.3.3 was "unstable". I knew that 0.3.3 was not more than alpha, and I presumed that 0.3 was stable. Sorry. >>> I don't think we need to qualify the releases with anything but the >>> version number and a list of changes. >> >> Why not (as long as we aren't going to do quality-fetishsm)? > > Because calling it "alpha" implies inferiority, and implies that > "beta" and "release" versions are forthcoming. That has not been our > model; it's too much formal structure for a project the scale of > Docutils. Ah, I see. So I'll drop the alpha-beta-stable concept at first. -- When replying to my email address, ensure that the mail header contains 'Felix Wiemann'. Please don't send unrequested mails > 64 KB. <http://www.ososo.de/> |