From: Felix W. <Fel...@gm...> - 2006-01-19 16:35:29
|
Daniele Varrazzo writes: > as far i can understand i can only substitute a directive, not a role, IMO inline directives and roles are conceptually the same thing. I think we should unify them, i.e. all inline directives become roles (or the other way round). In this case we should decide which of the two names ("inline directive" or "role") we want to drop; we probably don't need them both. This has been on my personal to-do list for a long time. Thanks for bringing it up! -- Felix Wiemann -- http://www.ososo.de/ |