From: Mike O. <ms...@oz...> - 2005-06-16 02:44:14
|
Felix Wiemann wrote: > Well, adding a comment is indeed the way to separate field lists at > the moment. That's fine. I can see how parallelism between field lists and regular lists (which allow a blank line between items) is important. >Regarding the indented paragraph, are you sure that you want to indicate >a block quote (see ><http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/restructuredtext.html#block-quotes>)? >If not, why are you indenting the paragraph? > > The document covers several application and platforms. Most of the instructions are common to all of them, but those that denote differences are indented. There's too many combinations to have a different style for each or use a note for them so I'm doing two styles, normal and indented. >>:: >> emerge PACKAGE -- Install the package. >> emerge '>=SECTION/PACKAGE-VERSION' -- Install this version minimum. >> >> > >There's a blank line missing after "::". > > Ah, I totally missed that. But it makes sense since a :: at the end of a paragraph works. >It has been proposed that the blank line be made unnecessary; see ><http://docutils.sf.net/docs/dev/todo.html#literal-block-without-a-blank-line>. >Would be a good idea indeed. > > I was expecting it to work like a comment or directive since that's what it looks like. >>.. admonition:: Do *NOT* put these files under Apache's document root. >> They are not static files to be published literally. Doing so is no help >> to the user and a security vulnerability. >> >>.. note:: >> Filenames are case-sensitive on Unix, case-insensitive on Windows, and >> either way on the Macintosh. >> >> > >While the second example ("note") should work as you expect, the >"admonition" directive indicates a *generic* admonition and needs a >title. See ><http://docutils.sf.net/docs/ref/rst/directives.html#generic-admonition>. > > Good, that answers another question of mine, why can't you have a title? So... I guess I need a blank line after the admonition line. |