Re: [Docutils-users] Vim Structured Text - 1.0beta8

[Stephen W. <go...@co...>]

David Goodger wrote:
>>2.
>>Double headers are parsed but treated double with the same char are
>>treated the same as with single line of ornamentation
>>===========
>>example
>>===========
>>
>>The same level as
>>
>>example
>>==========
> 
> That's a major difference.  It will break many reStructuredText
> documents, including most of Docutils' own documentation.

Okay, that seems very odd to me.  I'd always assumed that
reST allowed alternate markup for headers so that a user
could pick one -- I'm very surprised that you would use
2 different markups for the same level within a single
documentation set!  Weird.

Steve