From: David G. <go...@py...> - 2004-01-20 05:12:49
|
Mark Nodine wrote: > Now that I'm making nested inline the default, I'm having trouble > figuring out what to do with one of the inline markup tests, > namely:: ... > In each of these cases, the malformed embedded URI parses > recursively as implicit markup, resulting in a reference within a > reference. Should we > > (a) allow this embedding to occur? Perhaps. The URL being visible is an indication to the author that there's a problem. > (b) make a special case for not parsing implicit markup within a > reference? Perhaps. There are pros and cons to each approach. How about: parse it, but complain if a reference is created inside another reference. That may be best. -- David Goodger http://python.net/~goodger For hire: http://python.net/~goodger/cv |