[Docutils-develop] [docutils:bugs] #482 manpage: section numbers wrongly in boldface in "See also" section

[engelbert g. <gr...@us...>]

one problem is the manpage writer does not know it is man page reference, it is only marked as emphasize

second

~~~
*groff_man_style*\(7)
  is a reference to the *groff* *man* macro language, with much advice
  for document authors.
~~~

is
~~~
        <definition_list_item>
            <term>
                <emphasis>
                    groff_man_style
                (7)
            <definition>
~~~

and defintionlistitems are typeset BOLD 
admittedly a decision i simply made without asking

problem one would require the manpage writer to lex/parse


---

**[bugs:#482] manpage: section numbers wrongly in boldface in "See also" section**

**Status:** open
**Labels:** manpage writer 
**Created:** Wed Mar 27, 2024 01:22 AM UTC by G. Branden Robinson
**Last Updated:** Wed Mar 27, 2024 11:16 AM UTC
**Owner:** engelbert gruber


The parenthesized section number of a man page document should be rendered upright at normal weight, not in boldface.

This appears to be an unintentional defect in the manpage writer.  Here's a snippet of _rst2man_ output.

~~~
.SH SEE ALSO
.INDENT 0.0
.TP
.B \fIgroff_man_style\fP(7)
is a reference to the \fIgroff\fP \fIman\fP macro language, with much advice
for document authors.
.TP
.B \fImandoc\fP(1)
is a non\-\fIroff\fP\-based system for formatting man pages.
.UNINDENT
~~~

It's pretty confusing to humans to mix font selection escape sequences with _man_ font macros.  (I also think that macros should be used in preference to formatter requests or escape sequences wherever possible, but I acknowledge that this is a much bigger challenge for document format conversion programs than for human writers.)

Here's what I propose when formatting a man page cross reference, in case you're doing any pattern matching to detect them.

~~~
.TP
.B \fIgroff_man_style\fP\R(7)\fP
~~~

If you're _not_ doing pattern matching to detect man page cross references, the problem may be harder.

Here's my rST input for the foregoing.

~~~
See also
========

*groff_man_style*\(7)
  is a reference to the *groff* *man* macro language, with much advice
  for document authors.

*mandoc*\(1)
  is a non-*roff*-based system for formatting man pages.
~~~

It appears to me that the decision to set the paragraph tag (definition list headword) in bold was _rst2man_'s; it was not derived from any formatting in the rST source document.  I humbly suggest reconsidering that choice, and let rST document authors select whatever degree of typographic emphasis for the paragraph tag/definition list headword they desire.  In fact it appears to be that they can already do so, so the ``B`` call may just be getting in the way.


---

Sent from sourceforge.net because doc...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/bugs/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/docutils/admin/bugs/options.  Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.