From: David G. <go...@us...> - 2002-10-12 00:50:43
|
Richard Jones wrote: > It has some really good ideas in the output Agreed. > I haven't had a chance to look into what it takes to play with the > current docutils pysource effort to produce a similar output. Unless you've made some radical changes to the sandbox/tibs/pysource code (I confess that I haven't looked it over thoroughly), it still takes a very different path to create its output. You (and anybody interested) should read these first: * http://docutils.sf.net/spec/pysource.html * http://docutils.sf.net/spec/pep-0258.html#python-source-reader * http://docutils.sf.net/sandbox/tibs/pysource/notes/thoughts.html The last one consists of Tibs' parting notes summing up his ideas about where to go from here, and is especially relevant. I see you caught it from docutils-checkins though. -- David Goodger <go...@us...> Open-source projects: - Python Docutils: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/ (includes reStructuredText: http://docutils.sf.net/rst.html) - The Go Tools Project: http://gotools.sourceforge.net/ |