From: David G. <go...@us...> - 2002-09-17 01:45:37
|
Dean Goodmanson wrote: > I'm looking for the proper place to find past discussions and > discuss the following (without annoying cross posting): Discussions take place on the Python Doc-SIG list and the Docutils-develop list. Doc-SIG archive: http://www.python.org/pipermail/doc-sig/ Docutils-develop archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=8812 The Doc-SIG archive should be searchable at ActiveState or one of the other list mirrors. The SourceForge archive seems searchable too. > a. reSTX implementation (and plans) in Zope and CMF. Richard Jones has implemented a "ReStructuredText "... > b. StructuredText to reStructuredText conversion code, discussion, > etc. Not that I know of. > Similarly, HTML to reSTX as a potential migration tool: > STX->HTML->reSTX. Ditto. Contributions are welcome! > I'm looking to gather these resources and discussions > for supporting the implementation of reSTX in ZWiki ( > http://www.zwiki.org/ReStructuredText ) I looked at the page. Some corrections: Abbreviation : reSTX I've only seen this used in Zope-land, and I don't much like it. I prefer RST, but the most commonly used abbreviation is reST. Cons: Still requires double space "paragraph" seperation. I don't see how comparing equal counts a "con" against reStructuredText. :-) Add this to "Pros": Doesn't need blank lines between list items. Problems with STX Please use the permanent, up-to-date URL: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/spec/rst/problems.html Perhaps it's time for a Docutils FAQ. -- David Goodger <go...@us...> Open-source projects: - Python Docutils: http://docutils.sourceforge.net/ (includes reStructuredText: http://docutils.sf.net/rst.html) - The Go Tools Project: http://gotools.sourceforge.net/ |