|
From: engelbert g. <eng...@gm...> - 2013-05-02 18:15:13
|
On 2 May 2013 16:28, Michael Prisant <mic...@gm...> wrote: > So back to the cheatsheet -- perhaps using the cheatsheet to identify which > markup subset works with both the latex and html writers would be a more > user meaningful short term solution than indicating that cheetsheet should > be read as text. Bringing the non-html writers (especially the latex > writer) up to the full range of markup translation of the html writer might > be a longer term goal two things: a. contributions welcome (it helps a lot to clarify, even if not perfect. or to file the bug report, feature request) b. to me, reStructured text is not a markup, it is a document it is what you see is what you have and get, plus you can get more with docutils. tables are complex, there are numerous table packages for latex, this is not so because tables are simple. html escapes some of the complexity by literally stepping aside, but printouts do not scroll easily sideways. how to put the required information into reSt without degrading it to markup ? just so me all the best engelbert |