From: Peter F. <pf...@ar...> - 2013-02-19 16:10:04
|
David Goodger schrieb am Dienstag, den 19.02.2013 um 09:01: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Guenter Milde <mi...@us...> wrote: > > On 2013-02-18, David Goodger wrote: > >> Regardless of the bug in LaTeX formatting, the cheatsheet > >> (http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/cheatsheet.txt) is > >> really meant to be used in text (.txt) form. When it is processed, > >> much of the useful information disappears. It's meant as a reminder of > >> reST syntax. > > > >> So I recommend referring to the .txt original, rather than processing > >> it to .html or .pdf. > > > > Maybe we can extempt the cheatsheet from the files translated by the > > html-builder then? > > Why bother? We only have links to cheatsheet.txt. The fact that > cheatsheet.html exists doesn't bother me. > > At most I'd add a note, "If you're reading this as HTML, please see > `<cheatsheet.txt>`_ instead. ... +1 --- cheatsheet.txt.orig 2013-02-19 16:31:47.040172793 +0100 +++ cheatsheet.txt 2013-02-19 16:36:37.540228881 +0100 @@ -7,6 +7,12 @@ :Revision: $Revision: 7463 $ :Description: This is a "docinfo block", or bibliographic field list +IMPORTANT NOTE +============== +If you're reading this text as HTML, please click +`<cheatsheet.txt>`_ instead first. Otherwise you will +**NOT** see the reStructuredText input syntax examples! + Section Structure ================= Section titles are underlined or overlined & underlined. Regards, Peter Funk -- Peter Funk, home: ✉Oldenburger Str.86, D-27777 Ganderkesee mobile:+49-179-640-8878 phone:+49-421-20419-0 <http://www.artcom-gmbh.de/> office: ArtCom GmbH, ✉Haferwende 2, D-28357 Bremen, Germany |