Re: [Docutils-users] broken rst cheatsheet?

[David G. <go...@py...>]

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Guenter Milde <mi...@us...> wrote:
> On 2013-02-18, David Goodger wrote:
>> Regardless of the bug in LaTeX formatting, the cheatsheet
>> (http://docutils.sourceforge.net/docs/user/rst/cheatsheet.txt) is
>> really meant to be used in text (.txt) form. When it is processed,
>> much of the useful information disappears. It's meant as a reminder of
>> reST syntax.
>
>> So I recommend referring to the .txt original, rather than processing
>> it to .html or .pdf.
>
> Maybe we can extempt the cheatsheet from the files translated by the
> html-builder then?

Why bother? We only have links to cheatsheet.txt. The fact that
cheatsheet.html exists doesn't bother me.

At most I'd add a note, "If you're reading this as HTML, please see
`<cheatsheet.txt>`_ instead.

Otherwise, I don't see a problem that needs fixing here.

-- 
David Goodger <http://python.net/~goodger>