From: Guenter M. <mi...@us...> - 2010-04-28 08:27:07
|
On 2010-04-27, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > On 4/26/2010 2:45 AM, Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2010-04-24, Tim Daneliuk wrote: ... > 3) Ran the same thing *without* the --stylesheet=parskip argument and > got the same error. > This points inevitably to a misconfigured TeX installation, but I > haven't a clue what the issue might be. This is running on FreeBSD > 8.0-STABLE with the following relevant ports/packages: > docproj-jadetex-1.17_4 The "meta-port" for the FreeBSD Documentation Project > dvipsk-tetex-5.95a_5 Convert a TeX DVI file to PostScript > jadetex-3.13_6 A TeX backend for Jade, for typesetting SGML documents > latex-cjk-4.8.2_4 A LaTeX2e macro package which enables the use of CJK script > teTeX-3.0_4 A meta port for teTeX suite > teTeX-base-3.0_20 Thomas Esser's distribution of TeX & friends (binaries) > teTeX-texmf-3.0_6 Thomas Esser's distribution of TeX & friends (texmf tree) > tex-texmflocal-1.9 Meta-port that creates a site-local $TEXMF directory > xdvik-tetex-22.84.16_2 DVI Previewer(kpathsearch) for X teTeX is is rather outdated by now and discontinued. Even Debian switched to TeXLive some years ago. So, maybe it's a compatibility issue. > Ideas? * Test your LaTeX installation (verify it works as expected independent of Docutils). * Test without a makefile, with a very simple rst source. * Test without makefils with the offending rst source. >> provide a `minimal example`__ (smallest possible source that results >> in this error) and the generated latex file. __ http://docutils.sourceforge.net/BUGS.html#minimal-example Günter |