From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2008-02-15 15:22:45
|
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, David Goodger apparently wrote: > YAGNI (you ain't gonna need it). Added complexity for no gain. > You're going to have to show us some compelling use cases first. I have no strong feelings on this. I was just responding to the example:: .. [a+b] a thing .. [a:b] another The proposed substitution of a ``-`` for illegal characters produced a name clash. So I proposed ``--`` and ``..`` (two lines and two dots, just like in the replaced characters) to avoid this clash (and be more intuitively linked to the original name). That was my main point. I'll be happy with either! Cheers, Alan |