From: <go...@us...> - 2005-04-14 20:00:42
|
Author: goodger Date: 2005-04-14 22:00:30 +0200 (Thu, 14 Apr 2005) New Revision: 3214 Modified: trunk/docutils/docs/dev/rst/alternatives.txt Log: added a syntax idea for parameterized interpreted text Modified: trunk/docutils/docs/dev/rst/alternatives.txt =================================================================== --- trunk/docutils/docs/dev/rst/alternatives.txt 2005-04-13 18:18:41 UTC (rev 3213) +++ trunk/docutils/docs/dev/rst/alternatives.txt 2005-04-14 20:00:30 UTC (rev 3214) @@ -2764,6 +2764,18 @@ Do angle brackets connote URLs too much for this to be acceptable? How about the "tag" connotation -- does it save them or doom them? +3. `Nested inline markup`_ could prove useful here:: + + `CSS :def:`Cascading Style Sheets``:acronym: is used for HTML, + and `CSS :def:`Content Scrambling System``:acronym: is used for + DVDs. + + Inline markup roles could even define the default roles of nested + inline markup, allowing this cleaner syntax:: + + `CSS `Cascading Style Sheets``:acronym: is used for HTML, and + `CSS `Content Scrambling System``:acronym: is used for DVDs. + Does this push inline markup too far? Readability becomes a serious issue. Substitutions may provide a better alternative (at the expense of verbosity and duplication) by pulling the details out of the text |