From: Alan G I. <ai...@am...> - 2007-05-08 16:54:26
|
>>> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, G. Milde wrote: >>>>> a) no unnecessary packages (blind guess 10 to 20 lines less) >>>>> b) everything into the default external stylesheet and >>>> ... handle stylesheets similar to the html writer: >> [gr...@us...] >>> any votes for a or b or ... > On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, David Goodger wrote: >> I think (b) is the way to go. You can put all the detail you want in the >> stylesheet, and power users have the freedom to replace it. On Tue, 8 May 2007, (CEST) gr...@us... apparently wrote: > but this will temporary break all processing for people that have a > stylesheet configured, because then the defaults wont get included. > is a notification on docutils-develop and -user enough or can i do > anything else I just want to confirm that you plan to include these options (matching the HTML writer): --stylesheet-path=<file> --embed-stylesheet --link-stylesheet Please make sure the multiple files can be supplied to the first option! (And order matters.) I think it would be great to be able to include the default stylesheet in this list by using a special name (e.g., default), but I realize that is asking much. I assume the "link" option will use the "basename" of the file(s) supplied by the stylesheet.path (i.e., cut off the ``.sty``), since that is expected by ``\usepackage``. Cheers, Alan Isaac |